Without thinking, I decided to sit back, wait and stop the screen recording on the Air. In fact, while the 16” MacBook Pro was hurtling towards 20% completion, the Air was languishing in single digits. And isn’t it weird how that’s the case, given that we should really be rooting for the 16”? Alas, its performance with the colour grade set brand new expectations for this equally nascent Apple silicon-powered computer.īut the Air struggled – really struggled. This task was simpler to undertake, but just as intensive – if not more so – processor-wise, than the render.Įnsuring I had both laptops exporting with the exact same settings and to their respective desktops, I hit ‘go’ and started the timers. A £999 laptop had just spat loose tarmac into the front grille of its £3,500 cousin in a display of raw pace. This genuinely surprised me, as you’ll see in the video reaction at the top of this article. The Air? Silent (it has no fan), and barely lukewarm. ![]() Its fans were also roaring and near takeoff speed, and the metal above the keyboard was too hot to keep your finger on for any longer than a few seconds. The 16” MacBook Pro took about five minutes and was noticeably slower. That alone was impressive.īut I wasn’t really prepared for what happened next. The M1 MacBook Air completed the task in around two minutes. The colour grade was simple an introduction of some contrast, slight bump in exposure and a boost to saturation. power supply, rather than battery operation. ![]() no apps running in the background, bar the built-in macOS screen recording feature.My 16” MacBook Pro has worked flawlessly for 12 months, and consistently undertakes the two tasks that would play a central role in this battle with ease. Despite the emergence of the M1 chip, I think the 16” still has a place today within lots of people’s lives and businesses.īut I am intrigued to see how it performs against the M1. I’ve been using the MacBook Pro 16” for around a year now, and it is a superb machine. The speed with which they do so will dictate how quickly I can publish my YouTube videos or get paid by clients. Why did I pick these two tasks? As a video guy, I know they’re two of the most important functions my computers perform. This involved one piece of 4K footage that was 10 minutes long, and two tasks: If you see inaccuracies in our content, please report the mistake via this form.With limited time on my hands, I decided to conduct a quick but thorough test with a tool which I knew would put both machines through their paces. If we have made an error or published misleading information, we will correct or clarify the article. Our editors thoroughly review and fact-check every article to ensure that our content meets the highest standards. Our goal is to deliver the most accurate information and the most knowledgeable advice possible in order to help you make smarter buying decisions on tech gear and a wide array of products and services. ZDNET's editorial team writes on behalf of you, our reader. Indeed, we follow strict guidelines that ensure our editorial content is never influenced by advertisers. Neither ZDNET nor the author are compensated for these independent reviews. ![]() This helps support our work, but does not affect what we cover or how, and it does not affect the price you pay. When you click through from our site to a retailer and buy a product or service, we may earn affiliate commissions. And we pore over customer reviews to find out what matters to real people who already own and use the products and services we’re assessing. We gather data from the best available sources, including vendor and retailer listings as well as other relevant and independent reviews sites. ZDNET's recommendations are based on many hours of testing, research, and comparison shopping.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |